Case study

Property Damage Insurance — Industrial firm, $300M turnover

Before Huscarl After Huscarl

Huscarl scanner results

Over-insurance across all lines

  • $50M limit inconsistent with maximum loss of $25M due to a severe flood scenario
  • Strikes and riots cover adds no value
    Expensive to get from insurance companies, almost no exposure here
  • Well-calibrated deductibles
    All infrequent scenarios (4% probability or less) are covered

Huscarl Recommendations

  • Set overall limit to $25M
    Remove useless coverage layer between $25M and $50M
  • Exclude Strikes and Riots
    Remove expensive insuring agreement that makes no sense due to very low exposure
  • Install sprinklers
    Initial investment makes sense due to massive reduction of fire risk (-65% severity) and premiums

Reading the Huscarl Risk Map

• The larger the losses linked to a risk, the larger the coloured zone

• The more frequent a loss scenario, the darker the colour

• The insurance zone is represented by a solid line, and the coverage gap by a dashed line

Hover a risk to see details